Follow us in Twitter http://twitter.com/#!/MCyrusLatinA
sábado, 4 de diciembre de 2010
New Evidence: Miley Cyrus Nude Elaborate Fake
The Miley Cyrus nude photo controversy has roiled the Internet for a second day, as evidence increasingly suggests the full-frontal photo originally claimed to be the “Hannah Montana” star is actually another female poser.
The provocative nude and semi-nude photos rapidly went viral yesterday (Dec. 2). But it was difficult to pinpoint Miley in the raciest, full-frontal photo because it had been cropped just above the chin so the face could not be seen.
Celebrities have been plagued by fake nude photos for years. Recently, a nude photo purported to be Emma Watson circulated around campus at Brown University where she attends classes.
But it also proved to be fake.
In the latest developments, the Web site that initially posted the photo has since acknowledged that the woman is not Cyrus. Rather it is a 19-year-old British woman who looks remarkably like her and has impersonated Cyrus in the past.
If the photo is fake, it’s part of an elaborate hoax.
The photo in question, shows a nude female wearing an open flannel shirt.
Gossip Cop, which purports to debunk untrue gossip claimed the woman couldn’t be Cyrus because a known tattoo below her left breast wasn’t visible in the photo.
Also the woman is holding a cell phone in her left hand and Miley is right handed.
But the photo is clearly a shot of a reflection in a mirror, which would reverse the image. That means the left breast is obscured by the shirt and long tresses and the phone is being held in the right hand.
The photo shows the woman wearing a wrist band that looks likely something Miley wore in another photo.
The photo was purported to have been taken at the Westin Palace Hotel in Madrid, where Miley stayed while she was there.
Miley has also been known to send racy camera photos of herself to various boyfriends.
But the real evidence is a comparison of the female poser and the uncensored “Miley” photo. The tans lines in the two photos are identical.
(The girl in the photo has hair similar to Miley’s and the shirt is similar to one that Miley was photographed wearing in Madrid in early November. She was there for the MTV Europe Music Awards).
Other reports claim that Cyrus has asked her lawyers to pursue some sort of action as a result of the brouhaha.
But their options appear to be limited.
First, the hoax apparently took place overseas, either in Spain or Great Britain, which would make a legal pursuit very difficult.
Second, a lawsuit would probably require Cyrus to disclose the contents of her cell phone as part of discovery in the case.
That could lead to even more embarrassing discoveries.
If if she has deleted compromising photos, they could be uncovered forensically.
And, because the photo is fake, it could be considered a satire or spoof, which are afforded Constitution protections under the First Amendment, making it difficult to curb such expressions.
PerezHilton published a fake photo purportedly of Miley flashing her private parts getting out of an auto. No legal action followed after he claimed it was a joke.
Finally, Miley is now 18.
The provocative nude and semi-nude photos rapidly went viral yesterday (Dec. 2). But it was difficult to pinpoint Miley in the raciest, full-frontal photo because it had been cropped just above the chin so the face could not be seen.
Celebrities have been plagued by fake nude photos for years. Recently, a nude photo purported to be Emma Watson circulated around campus at Brown University where she attends classes.
But it also proved to be fake.
In the latest developments, the Web site that initially posted the photo has since acknowledged that the woman is not Cyrus. Rather it is a 19-year-old British woman who looks remarkably like her and has impersonated Cyrus in the past.
If the photo is fake, it’s part of an elaborate hoax.
The photo in question, shows a nude female wearing an open flannel shirt.
Gossip Cop, which purports to debunk untrue gossip claimed the woman couldn’t be Cyrus because a known tattoo below her left breast wasn’t visible in the photo.
Also the woman is holding a cell phone in her left hand and Miley is right handed.
But the photo is clearly a shot of a reflection in a mirror, which would reverse the image. That means the left breast is obscured by the shirt and long tresses and the phone is being held in the right hand.
The photo shows the woman wearing a wrist band that looks likely something Miley wore in another photo.
The photo was purported to have been taken at the Westin Palace Hotel in Madrid, where Miley stayed while she was there.
Miley has also been known to send racy camera photos of herself to various boyfriends.
But the real evidence is a comparison of the female poser and the uncensored “Miley” photo. The tans lines in the two photos are identical.
Other reports claim that Cyrus has asked her lawyers to pursue some sort of action as a result of the brouhaha.
But their options appear to be limited.
First, the hoax apparently took place overseas, either in Spain or Great Britain, which would make a legal pursuit very difficult.
Second, a lawsuit would probably require Cyrus to disclose the contents of her cell phone as part of discovery in the case.
That could lead to even more embarrassing discoveries.
If if she has deleted compromising photos, they could be uncovered forensically.
And, because the photo is fake, it could be considered a satire or spoof, which are afforded Constitution protections under the First Amendment, making it difficult to curb such expressions.
PerezHilton published a fake photo purportedly of Miley flashing her private parts getting out of an auto. No legal action followed after he claimed it was a joke.
Finally, Miley is now 18.
Miley Cyrus Nude!? Nah, Photo Looks Fake (See It)
Now 18, but barely, Miley Cyrus has hit the Internet in provocative nude and semi-nude photos that are rapidly going viral. But is the raciest, full-frontal photo really her? Here’s the evidence for and against.
While there are some tantalizing clues that suggest it could be her, one clue suggests that it isn’t.
Although the shirt partially obscures her breast, part of the tattoo should be visible.
On the other hand, the girl in the photo has hair similar to Miley’s and the shirt is similar to one that Miley was photographed wearing in Madrid in early November. She was there for the MTV Europe Music Awards.
But the photo could be the reflection of Miley in a mirror. If so, the image would be reversed and it would correspond closely to the singer.
Miley has also been known to send racy camera photos of herself to various boyfriends.
While Miley was a minor when previous photos surfaced, she’s 18 now and legally an adult, leaving her little recourse to prevent provocative photos from being published.
But if they were taken in Madrid, then their publication could be legally questionable because Miley was 17 at the time.
She vamped it up at the MTV European Music Video Awards in a daring dress and on a recent European tour, she kissed her girl backup singers and a male dancer groped her breast during a dance number.
Her new video for her song, “Who Owns My Heart,” pushed the envelope on sexuality even more
Ever since Miley posed in Vanity Fair magazine semi-nude at the tender age of 15, the Internet has been hit from time to time by racy photos of the teen, most of which appear to have been self-taken with a camera phone.
Some obviously fake photos have also surfaced and at least one of the latest pictures is debatable.The photo in question, showing a nude female wearing an open flannel shirt, is cut off at the neck, making it impossible to confirm that it’s Miley
While there are some tantalizing clues that suggest it could be her, one clue suggests that it isn’t.
Miley has a tattoo under her left breast, and the tattoo, which reads “Just Breathe” isn’t visible in the photo.
On the other hand, the girl in the photo has hair similar to Miley’s and the shirt is similar to one that Miley was photographed wearing in Madrid in early November. She was there for the MTV Europe Music Awards.
The photo shows the woman wearing a wrist band that looks likely something Miley wore in another photo, but it’s on the left wrist in the nude photo and on Miley’s right wrist in the normal photo.
Also the nude photo shows the woman holding the camera in her left hand; Miley is right handed and is pictured in other photos holding the camera in her right hand.But the photo could be the reflection of Miley in a mirror. If so, the image would be reversed and it would correspond closely to the singer.
The left breast with the tattoo would be obscured by her hair and shirt.
The photo was purported to have been taken at the Westin Palace Hotel in Madrid, where Miley stayed while she was in town. Her cell phone was reportedly recently stolen.Miley has also been known to send racy camera photos of herself to various boyfriends.
While Miley was a minor when previous photos surfaced, she’s 18 now and legally an adult, leaving her little recourse to prevent provocative photos from being published.
But if they were taken in Madrid, then their publication could be legally questionable because Miley was 17 at the time.
Miley is on the rebound from ex-boyfriend and Liam Hemsworth, the Australian actor who co-starred with her in her movie, “The Last Song.” They were together for about a year.
Since the end of her Disney run as “Hannah Montana,’ Miley has been ramping up her sexuality as she begins the crossover to adult stardom.
Her new video for her song, “Who Owns My Heart,” pushed the envelope on sexuality even more
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)